On 9 March 2012 14:47, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 15:34, schrieb Gerard Meijssen: > > The question you have to ask yourself, where is the value in Commons when >> we do not optimise it as much as possible so that it will be the >> repository >> of choice of freely licensed imagery. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> > That's right. But why did the current approaches only had one goal - the > exclusion/hiding of controversial media - in mind? > > Partly because it is the low hanging fruit (i.e. the thing that will have the most impact in forwarding our goals of accessible knowledge). Partly because of the old adage that things that people complain about the most are those that get noticed. It is unfortunate that the board chose to cast the initiative in this light; because I can entirely see why some factions would find it unpalatable (as presented). Tom _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
