On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 10:03 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > I would try to go for simple "Gnome Conference" or maybe "Gnome Conf". > I think that "GConf" is just being too cute.
Agreed GConf isn't a good idea any more than OAF or BONOBO would be. A name change of a conference usually is done for one of two reasons -- (1) legal, e.g. to get out of a contract with a hotel chain (2) because the content of the conference has changed E.g. I'd be in favour of a combined KDE+GNOME conference called Linux Desktop 2006 although it would probably also have a trade show and a very different feel. If the feel is the same, keep the name. You won't turn gnome-haters into advocates (as Dave Neary hoped) at a conference no Gnome-hater would ever attend. Instead you need outreach, you need to identify good speakers to be advocates, sent out with no cloak or shoes (Biblical reference) to preach the Good Gnews of Gnome. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org On the Internet no-one can see if you're wearing shoes. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list