> Who are these untrustworthy people? I have never been a candidate but am
> getting tired of these implications that some of the candidates in the
> past have been untrustworthy or that others have succeeded to become board
> members simply to occupy seats. It seems to me that every candidate
> received a significant number of votes, ie. more than 1 or 2, so
> apparently has the trust of somebody.
Sorry to point out a harsh reality, but there have been numerous times when
this has happened.
To call this a "reality" is somewhat of an exaggeration, because
whether any person is "trustworthy" is a matter of opinion.
It may have happened that person X ran for the board because person X
considered candidate Y untrustworthy. However, it appears not
everyone shared X's opinion. Those who voted for Y probably consider
Y trustworthy; others may have considered Y trustworthy but preferred
other candidates.
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
