Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Alan Horkan wrote:
The way I always thought of the purpose of the referendum was that it
should be possible - in fact it is a necessity - that others beyond the
official board be involved in organising. The number of people on the
board seems to be a symptom of the fact that it is difficult to get people
involved and helping out with the foundation any other way.
I agree with Alan on this (and if you read the Inkscape list, you know
that Alan and I don't agree that much :) If these people want to help
out, and there are tasks that the board wishes to assign to them, that'd
be great. And, I would consider "did X for the board" a great plus on any
candidacy statement for the next election. But, they can't be members of
the board without an election.
--Ted
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
