tir, 01 08 2006 kl. 15:07 +0100, skrev Telsa Gwynne: > Ar Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:57:10AM +0200, ysgrifennodd Philip Van Hoof: > > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:38 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > The idea is to state what we consider acceptable behaviour, in order to > > > advertize to newcomers what they can expect when getting involved in > > > GNOME, and to reinforce this existing behaviour, so that bad behaviour is > > > more clearly unacceptable when it does happen. It says who we are and who > > > we want to be and how we'd like people to think of us. > > > ... > > I agree and understand the code on that wiki. I would accept cooperating > > with somebody who does and who doesn't. It's his/her personality and > > his/her behaviour. It's not me (nor GNOME) to judge it. > > You are saying that it's not up to you to judge people's behaviour? > I judge all the time, and really I bet you do too. And I am really fed > up that Murray has worked on this for months, and now people are still > saying "It's too hard! It's too official! I might have a bad day!" > > No-one is suggesting that you are banned from being rude (unfortunately). > That list says "Advice" at the top. And the idea is that those are the > behaviour that Gnome people think we should be following. It doesn't > say everyone will always be perfect. It's more about setting a standard.
I entirely agree with Telsa. Murray did a very good job drafting our written down Code of Conduct and I think we need it. For those who might feel they have a bad day please spare other innocent persons to share it with you. Most e-mails can wait an other day till you feel good again and are able to behave civilized:) I think that we have most people with us now and can agree on the GNOME Code of Conduct. Anne _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list