Hi Bill, > I think the second term in your Princeton Wordnet citation is the one we > are aiming for: e.g. "principles".
Great. All I mean to say is that I disagree with Jeff's belief that "their misinterpreting it shows more about them than the CoC itself". People assuming that "code" means "code" aren't off their rockers. If it means that we need to come up with a better word that more clearly describes the CoC's intent, such as "declaration of principles", great. Let's call it that instead and move on. But let's not insult people who hear "code" and think "laws" along the way. That would be against articles 1 and 3 of our declaration of principles. Best, Dom -- Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
