OK, anyway, I think the current board extending its mandate is not a good thing because the "contract" with the voting body (the membership) is already defined. Maybe the next board can enjoy an extended term if approved in a election. I agree that would be a better approach.
On 8/14/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:33 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > > OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to > > face meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term > > limit of the board. > > And why do you think so? I totally understand that you may be against > extending the term of the current board. That makes total sense, and > there's no consensus even at the board level. But, what do you see so > in need of justification for extending the term of one board (the next > one) from 12 months to 17 months? How can that affect the foundation in > a negative way? > > > behdad >
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
