fre 2009-11-27 klockan 10:53 +0100 skrev Murray Cumming: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:50 -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > > Alternative proposal: lets deal with the problem at hand and get our > > story straight about what is planet.gnome.org, what can be posted > > there (i.e. no porn and vulgar language etc.) and how we can help > > to enforce a reasonably exact policy on an exact resource which > > is planet.gnome.org. > > planet.gnome.org is hard to moderate. Editors can only remove an entire > blog. It would be easier if the software allowed the existing editors to > remove a single blog post. > > Then we could have long discussions about censorship instead. >
Personally I stopped reading planet.gnome.org because I wanted to know what was happening in GNOME-land, not about the developers pets, kids and snowboarding preferences. For gentoo, they have two feeds: the "planet", and the "universe", where the planet only aggregates those blog posts that are tagged with gentoo, and the universe aggregates the rest. I cannot understand why GNOME cannot have this system also? Then for the "planet" you can have a code of conduct of what they are allowed to tag as GNOME (i.e. upcoming events in OSS-land where GNOME will be represented, development in projects blessed/used by GNOME, comments about projects being blessed/used by GNOME, projects interesting for people interested in GNOME), and a "universe" with maybe an disclaimer that the posts there can have nothing what so ever to do with GNOME. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list