2010/6/3 Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>: > > > 2010/6/3 Andreas Nilsson <nisses.m...@home.se> >> >> On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote: >> >> >>> >>> And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're >>> doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting >>> them. >> >> But would't you like to have the points you disagree with be discussed or >> reevaluated? >> I think this is the issue the community is facing. There is a difference >> between "We are going to do it like that because we think its right, and >> that is how it is gonna be" and "We are doing it like that because we think >> it is right, but we are open for discussion" >> Right now the Shell developers are somewhere between both stand points. I >> know some developers who were able to cooperate with them. But I think >> more transparency around discussions and evaluations are missing. >> >> Just a quick note regarding the design procedures here. >> From my experience, Jon and Jeremy hang out both hang out in #gnome-design >> all day and are publically discussing all design issues there (even down to >> the smallest details). >> Me, Hylke, Garrett, Jakub and others have all been giving feedback, >> drawing mockups and evaluating designs, even though, as always, Jon and >> Jeremy have been doing most of the job (as us others have other day jobs and >> priorities). >> - Andreas >> > > This would be a good FAQ. We really do need a gnome-shell FAQ I think. I > might help out on the whole community thing on shell if people are willing, > it depends on whether this six month project I'm on comes to a close. My > contributions have tapered off due to a high work and personal load.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/FAQ Jon _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list