> > > This is not a complicated process, it is fairly clear and transparent > > (especially when compared with the alternative). What is the problem with > > using It? > There is none. > > > At the moment we are talking about whether it is justifiable to tell all > > successful interns that they are not eligible for membership > We're not. > > Problem solved. Next. >
Really? GNOME have no role in this statement which went out to the OP and GSoC intern lists in August of 2014?[1] Before denying this is a practice again, draw your attention to the last line which says" If you only started contributing to GNOME after February 2014, we ask that you continue contributing for another half a year before applying http://www.gnome.org/foundation/membership/apply/";. The problem cannot be solved if this continues to be the message going out about GNOME membership eligibility. That message is not a true reflection of GNOME's actually rules on membership eligibility. [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-soc-list/2014-August/msg00000.html
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
