On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeesha...@gnome.org> wrote: > Yeah I understand that but I'm wondering if they could be persuaded > not to treat all applying projects equally and give more room and time > to projects that are more popular/bigger. I didn't want to say bad of > any projects in particular here but I feel I have to give an example, > to make my point so I'll mention one that I actually love: Guile. > Given that there is a handful of people who use Guile (or even Scheme > in general), I really don't see why it should be given the same amount > of room/time as GNOME and KDE.
We were also allocated a single table instead of the usual two we get to make room for more projects. See it this way: the ones you call bigger projects usually have the means to hold at least one yearly conference on their own. The smaller ones don't get to meet that often. Also they really need the exposure FOSDEM provides them, and as you say the bigger projects are already popular. If the Guile people don't have a talk at FOSDEM, where would they have it? -- Alexandre Franke _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
