On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 10:41 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 15:46 +0100, Mathieu Duponchelle wrote: > > Hey, you did not react to Nicolas Dufresne's suggestion of using > > webrtc ? > > Services like appear.in do not require installing extra software, > > as > > most > > of the heavy lifting is already done by modern browsers ( I'm sure > > someone > > will implement support in emacs at some point :) ). > > I agree, WebRTC is clearly the winning technology and the way to go > in > the future. > > It's not true that all modern browsers support it, though, so I don't > think it's fair to start using it quite yet. The implementation in > WebKit, for example, is still buggy and disabled in both WebKitGTK+ > and > Safari. That needs fixed before we start using it for GNOME events, > else people won't be able to participate with the GNOME web > browser....
That is the spirit! Although, we had extensions that did not work on the GNOME Web browser either. -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/ _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
