Please, if you respond to this mail, CC desktop-devel-list and not any of the other lists, as we can't have a productive conversation split across so many lists.
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 21:25 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > As you probably know, for one reason or other, scheduling > applications > have important drawbacks in GNOME right now. And after studying the > problem for a while, I came to the conclusion that the California > application is the closest to do it right now. Hi, Thanks for taking initiative with this. I agree, we need to roll out a modern calendar app sooner rather than later. Are you aware of the GNOME Calendar project, and if so, can you elaborate on why you think California is a better bet than improving GNOME Calendar? The applications look quite similar to me, but GNOME Calendar is a very active project headed towards becoming a core GNOME app, whereas California is completely dead. The only reason GNOME Calendar is not in core already is that I've found it's slow and awkward to select start and end time when adding new events, as compared to doing the same quickly and easily in Evolution. This is a problem, but I don't think this would be so hard to improve. Michael P.S. You linked to Ubuntu's downstream bugtracker; California uses bugzilla.gnome.org for bug tracking: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html&product=california _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
