= Foundation Board Minutes for Tue, January 9th 2018, 18:00 UTC =

Next meeting date Tue, January 16th 2018, 18:00 UTC

== Attending ==

 * Alexandre Franke
 * Carlos Soriano
 * Meg Ford
 * Allan Day
 * Nuritzi Sanchez
 * Rosanna Yuen
 * Neil McGovern
 * Sriram Ramkrishna

== Regrets ==

 * Cosimo Cecchi

== Missing ==

== Agenda ==

 * LAS update & Sri joins the call

== Postponed agenda ==

 * Conference spending policy updates (see ongoing agenda item and
mailing list proposal) (Allan)
 * GNOME Maps (Meg)
 * Review outgoing items

== Minutes ==

 * Sri joined the call to give an update on LAS

== Ongoing ==

'''This section includes items which have seen an update in the last
30 days. Format is "YYYY-MM-DD, action|discussion|abstract" for this
and subsequent minutes sections'''

 * LAS update and budget request
  * A bid for Denver has been put together
  * They want to book the venue as soon as possible
  * We didn’t get any information before the meeting and we would like
some time to get through it
  * Vote will happen on the list.

 * GNOME Maps and Amisha's email
  * The Mapbox service is going to run out at the end of the year
  * Meg spoke to some of the Maps developers about this the last time
it was an issue. Available options back then:
   1. Get another coupon for free access
   2. Pay, but with a discounted rate
   3. Run our own tile server
  * We probably need a short-term solution before the coupon runs out,
and we don't have long
  * We think that the current coupon was organised directly between
the Maps developers and Mapbox - the Foundation Board probably wasn't
involved
  * Neil backs a short-term solution by renewing the coupon; then need
to calculate how much capacity we're using and what it would cost
  * ACTION: Meg to speak to the Maps developers about renewing the
coupon and calculating the long-term cost
  * 2017-12-19
   * We got a cost estimate and they are willing to give us a
discount, we need to tell them how much we’d be able to pay
   * They are willing to extend the free coupon temporarily
   * We need to explore options
    * Client-side rendering + our own vector server should be the preferred one
   * ACTION: Meg to discuss with the Maps team

 * Events code of conduct arrangements
  * Draft in progress
  * Once ready, we can start a community consultation phase
  * Current draft mentions a committee that would help resolving incidents
   * Is the board ok with forming a committee for that purpose?
   * No objections, the responsabilities and attributions will be
explored further down the line
  * When a local organisation handles the event in Europe for us, we
need a contract with them
   * This contract should cover handling of personal data that they
collect for us
   * See 
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/international-transfers/transfer/index_en.htm
for the standard contracts
  * The board needs to consider letting the community vote eventually

 * GNOME.Asia committee & Board membership
  * Nuritzi is considering joining the organizing committee, to be the
board liaison
  * Other directors can think about it and eventually join too

 * Follow-up on "Reviving Free Software Macedonia"
  * Monthly rental fee for the place where they meet (€300)
  * They seem to have a lead for sponsors, but would like us to help bootstrap
  * Not clear what their ask is.
  * We recommend they come up with a clear plan and specific outcomes
for GNOME, then take it to the engagement budget holder

 * Conference spending policy updates
  * The current policy would allow organizers to spend money they
haven’t raised yet, which could lead to a loss
  * Carlos suggested to approve two complementary budgets
   * a part that can only be spent if raised
   * a part that can be spent even if not raised, to make sure the
conference happens
  * Organizers are expected to make a profit, but a small loss would
not be a problem
  * The main goal should be to make a good conference
  * How does the organizers forecast the amount they’ll raise?
  * How does the newly appointed sponsorship committee tie in with that?
   * Coordination between the two is expected
  * VOTE: approve new policy with 2 budgets for conferences (minimal +
extras depending on money raised)
   +1 Carlos, -1 Allan, Meg. Abstained: Alexandre. VOTE DOESN’T PASS
  * VOTE: conference organizers should be required to have a new
budget approved by the board if they raised less than 70% of their
budgeted income
   +1 Allan, Meg, Abstained: Carlos, Alexandre. VOTE PASSED
  * 70% by what time? The problem is that conferences often don't know
what their income is going to be until very late - sponsors are often
confirmed at the last minute.
  * VOTE: invalidate the previously passed vote (let's give this more
time to see if we can find a good solution)
   +1 Alexandre, Allan, Carlos, Abstained: Meg. VOTE PASSED
  * 20171031 - Neil suggests new rule that allows to limit the loss
and gives organizers a bit of leeway, taking into account the evolving
nature of account balance
   * ACTION: Allan to prepare a new proposal to revisit this at a later meeting

 * Privacy campaign funds
  * 2016-09-27
   * Draft is out for the Board to review and give feedback
   * ACTION: Cosimo to try and form a committee to review internship proposals
  * 2016-10-26
   * We are aiming for an internship round in spring 2017
  * 2017-07-26
   * Carlos and Zeeshan are taking this over -- the plan is still to
do internships
    * 2017-10-14
     * Carlos created wiki page at https://wiki.gnome.org/Internships

 * Name for internships for privacy funds
  * If there is no contract it is not technically an internship
  * Discussion needs to continue on list
  * 2017-10-24
   * GSoC are not called internships and there is no contract with the student
    * The organising entity also does not have authority over the
participants, the project entity does
   * Outreachy on the other hand is called internship and there is a contract
    * Same kind of relationship
   * We could try and reuse the contracts from Outreachy
   * ACTION: Zana to get a copy of the contract
    * Done
   * ACTION: Neil to ask Karen
    * 20171031 - Done, karen says steal away.
   * ACTION: Carlos to prepare a version for us
    * You can check at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ew2nW5EJfCERFWsOM11_BoPPO5B8sWjugPpXLaX4Jno/edit?usp=sharing

 * Intention to create marketing committee
  * To dispense money for small events and marketing line items
  * In the meantime, we would have an individual budget holder
  * VOTE: appoint Nuritzi as the temporary budget holder
   * +1 Nem con. VOTE PASSES
  * There are concerns about the correct course of action.
  * ACTION: Nuritzi to come up with a charter for the proposed committee

 * Zazzle store
  * We have a link on the page where we list vendors
  * Andreas confirmed that Stormy is the one with access
  * ACTION: Allan to try to reach out to Stormy
   * 2017-10-08 - Allan got in touch with Stormy and got some login
information, but he still can't access the account. More followup is
required.
  * ACTION: Nuritzi to assess the quality and check whether we want to
continue using them

 * Looking for sponsorship for GitLab runners
  * To increase our Continuous Integration capacity on the GNOME
GitLab server, we'll need to provision some more servers, as we
migrate more projects there
  * We could ask for help to our Advisory Board, or use our network to
ask for support from other companies
   * It would make more sense to ask for hardware/cycles directly,
rather than fundraising, since server bandwidth is a recurring cost
  * 2017-10-08
   * Neil is waiting for verification before this can proceed further
   * 2017-10-31 - we're verified! Neil to talk to sysadmin
  * ACTION: Neil to talk with Andrea Veri about this
  * ACTION: once done, Neil to announce it
  * 2017-12-12: [NM] av prodded again

 * Calls with committees
  * Twice a year with each committee, once after the board elections
(end June/early July and then late November-early January).
  * The call is a touch point - a way of checking in. Needs to
stimulate ongoing conversations and ad hoc problem solving. Committees
will be invited to calls with the whole Board to problem solve around
specific things.
  * One board member and the ED meet with each committee (or a board
member and the director of operations if there's no ED).
  * Where possible the same board member should be consistent.
  * Board representatives then feed back to the rest of the board.
  * 2017-10-08
   * First meetings in the sequence to happen in November. Should
focus on collaboratively setting goals and identifying issues.
   * Once the
   * ACTION: Carlos to meet with membership committee, see if we
should update committee charter
https://wiki.gnome.org/MembershipCommittee
   * ACTION: Alexandre to meet with the travel committee, see if we
should update committee charter
https://wiki.gnome.org/Travel/Committee
   * ACTION: Cosimo to meet with the sponsorship committee
  * 2017-12-19 Committee check-ins - we were supposed to have done
this in November
   * Travel call should happen in January, currently being scheduled
   * Membership call should also happen soon
   * Cosimo is not on the call and won’t be back from travel until the
end of January

 * Foundation support for Flathub
  * 2017-05-09
   * The Board voted to try and use some of our pro-bono counsel time
towards the Flathub legal framework, provided our lawyers agree
   * ACTION: Neil to connect to Luis
  * 2017-05-16 - Exact questions to ask Luis are being worked up
  * 2017-06-06 - Questions sent to Luis, being looked at.
  * 2017-09-05 - Being passed to Karen now, discussions have stalled a
little, Neil chasing up
  * 2017-10-08
   * Neil and Rob are going to meet Karen at Freenode Live and try to
talk about this
  * 2017-10-31 - Rob got sent to Indonesia, Neil to set up call with
Karen/Rob to discuss
  * 2017-11-14 - Prodding email sent
  * ACTION: Neil to send another email to Luis and check if he’s available.
  * ACTION: Meg to ask Karen whether she can recommend someone
  * 2017-11-21 - Karen came back, call set up for next week
  * 2017-12-12 - Karen is drafting some texts which should get Flathub
the legal framework required.

 * Hackfest process documentation
  * 2017-02-14
   * ACTION: Nuritzi to take a stab at updating the documentation for
the process to request a hackfest and responsibilities between Board
and TC
  * 2017-05-02
   * Nuritzi will work on this by end of May, check in then
  * 2017-09-05: Nuritzi updated the wiki about a week ago but we
should go over this in Berlin.
  * 2017-10-08
   * Part of this was done at the hackfest, we'll need to update the wiki page
   * Another part is pending reply from Pam about how an event can use
the GNOME wordmark
   * ACTION: Nuritzi to update the wiki page, including Alexandre's
proposed statement about openness of hackfests

 * Friends of GNOME
  * 2016-08-10
   * ACTION: Allan to get in touch with Tobi and the sysadmin team to
migrate the FoG infrastructure over to GNOME
  * 2017-03-07
   * Allan will pass this on to Neil, and connect him to Tobi
  * 2017-04-18 - Neil has CRM working (ish) on the gnome website,
we're looking at how to move the PayPal IPN to CiviCRM
   * At sysadmin meeting at GUADEC
  * 2017-10-31 - Should happen around december

=== Ongoing but stalled ===

'''This section includes items which haven't seen an update in the
last 30 days.'''

 * Dropping dates in copyright claims on our websites
  * 2016-12-06
   * ACTION: Alexandre to send an email to foundation-list with a
proposal for discussion
  * 2016-12-20
   * Next step seems to be to reach out to Creative Commons to get
advice on what exactly can and should be done
  * 2017-01-24
   * Alexandre reached out to Creative commons
  * 2017-02-28
   * Alexandre will try alternative channels
  * 2017-05-02
   * We got a reply, Alexandre to follow up
  * 2017-05-30
   * Two options
    * Have terms of use on the website that state that linking to a
page is sufficient attribution
    * Require contributors to assign their attribution to the GNOME Foundation

 * Paypal Giving Fund
  * Alexandre suggested in december 2015 to get us enrolled in the program
   * That would give us exposure. For example Humble bundle allows to
direct the charity part of purchases towards any of their participants
  * Zana tried to get us in sometime before may 2016, we never heard back.
  * 2016-09-06
   * ACTION: Zana to look into it

=== Ongoing but no director assigned ===

'''This section includes items which haven't seen an update in the
last 30 days and have no Director assigned'''


== Nice to have ==

'''This section includes items which we would love to see happen at
some point but lack the time to effectively become reality'''

 * Contract template for future use organizations for which we handle money
  * Kat to draft this
  * Alexandre took over
  * 2017-07-26
   * This is close to being done

 * Privacy policy for GNOME services
  * Current draft is at https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/Privacy
  * Sysadmin Team's NDA should also be covered when dealing with this item
  * Kat or Allan to write up the policy
  * Kat or Allan to write up recommended wording for distribution
privacy policies, regarding the behaviour of GNOME software
  * 2017-07-26
   * Allan is still working on this, but with low priority

== Discussed on the mailing list ==


== Completed actions ==
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to