Hi, On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 10:00 +0000, Allan Day wrote: > * Moderation of public mailing lists (Carlos) > * There have been some complaints that mailing lists aren't being > properly moderated - primarily unpleasant/toxic emails being ignored What kind of moderation would have been considered to be "proper"?
> * There's no escalation process - what can people do if they feel > they've been mistreated? On a public mailing list, you mean? I see multiple options. Depending on what it means for someone to *feel* mistreated. And then it's hard to argue about someone's feelings. > * Is it the moderator's role to police behaviour, or is it more of > an admin role? I see two separate roles there. One is the list owner or someone who feels responsible for having the mailing list in first place. And then I see the moderator to mostly reject SPAM. I have that latter role for a few dozen mailing lists and I couldn't do policing of people, because that would mean that I'd have to actively read all these lists. Neither do I think that it's a smart move to stop someone being stupid in public. Cheers, Tobi _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
