Hello all, The board discussed in the last meeting the validity of the document and has approved that the current proposal, including its last changes, is legitimate, so its evaluation will be continued.
Best, Carlos Soriano On 24 April 2018 at 10:45, Allan Day <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > Benjamin Berg <benja...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > ... > > I think my stance is quite clear. As Allan stated quite literally, he > > continued working on the Draft without including the rest of the WG in > > this work. Regardless of whether Allan was acting as a board member or > > chairman of the WG, he has overstepped his authority by doing so. > > Or, to put it another way - Neil and I made a small number of edits to > a document which had previously been worked on for 14 months, which we > then put to the board to review and vote on. > > It should be noted that the board group includes every active member > of the code of conduct working group, with the exception of Ben. So > "without including the rest of the WG" translates to "without > including Ben". As already stated, this was a direct response to > repeated unacceptable behaviour on Ben's part. > > There is no formal process for the code of conduct working group, so > talk of "authority" and "legitimacy" is moot. However, I do believe > that the proposal that has been sent to the board is a fair reflection > of the group's work as a whole, and that's the important thing. > > > As > > such, I do not consider the current documents to be a legitimate > > proposal from the WG that the board could even start to consider. > > The proposal that has been sent to the board is the result of the > entire group's work for 14 months. It is also the outcome of the > community consultation that we ran. The vast majority of the working > group will have the opportunity to review the proposal before it goes > to a vote. > > Allan > -- > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/board-list > > From time to time confidential and sensitive information will be discussed > on this mailing list. Please take care to mark confidential information as > confidential, and do not redistribute this information without permission. >
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
