I disagree with that blanket statement. Sflow is very useful, but not as widely supported as SNMP. For applications like Cacti or MRTG, you really benefit from gathering information via SNMP.
Each protocol has different uses and different information that it collects. Neither, in my opinion, is one "better" than the other, just different. Chris mail user wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:30:45 +0200 > > use sflow and all be ok > > "Rens" <rens at autempspourmoi.be> wrote: > > > -- Chris Gauthier, CCNA, Network+, A+ Network Administration Team Portland Community College Portland, Oregon "For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return." --Leonardo da Vinci
