Hi Spencer, You write "vpls end-point as untag port and tag-type 9100", how can we set tag type for untag port ?
The existing backbone ring only consist some FESX and single MLX. The CES is new and use new paradigm. Any other ways with that types of platform for adding new customer node without have to register VLAN ID on every segment ? Best regards, > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:50:11 +0800 > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] VPLS and Q-in-Q > > Dear Sir: > > For MLX/XMR platform, you just need to config the vpls end-point as untag > port and tag-type 9100. However, I am afraid that Q-in-Q plus VPLS may not > fulfill your requirement. It seems that you need MAC-in-MAC to meet your > requirement. You may need add CES-2000 between VPLS and Q-in-Q. > > Regards, > > Spenser. _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
