Hi Geert,

in errno.h you defined all the different error values beginning with  
EI2CBUSNFREE  1

This confused me a little bit, because this overlaps with the error  
EINVAL, which is used by i2c_ioctl() also and has the value of 1  
also. Maybe it would be better to shift the error numbers a little  
bit. What is your opinion?

....................
Thomas Treyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fon: +49 89 7854715
Voice Mail: +49 721 151273565
Mobil: +49 175 2377256

Boschetsrieder Straße 63
81379 München

Am 07.01.2007 um 19:45 schrieb Geert Vancompernolle:

> Hi,
>
> As I mentioned a while ago (see thread
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/foxboard/message/3020), I was busy
> studying and possibly trying to improve the current version of the I2C
> driver.
>
> Well, I've just finished reworking the I2C driver. The changes are
> quite drastical. The changes result in a faster driver and now it can
> cope with all possible cases (at least, the ones that I know of...).
>
> The driver has been tested on several I2C components (see further) and
> there are more to come...
>
> I've created a zip file that contains the following items:
>
> - a PDF file describing the changes, showing DSO plots and giving in
> detail the timings of the current I2C implementation.
>
> - a new I2C error header file i2c_errno.h (see PDF file for some
> explanation)
>
> - the changed i2c.h header file
>
> - the changed etraxi2c.h header file
>
> - the new I2C source file
>
> - an example file which has been used to test the I2C driver on the
> following devices:
> * NVM 24C32
> * PCF8574
> * PCF8591
>
> - Makefile to use for the example code.
>
> - switches header file to activate one or more of the tested  
> components.
>
> Those interested can have a look over here:
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/foxboard/files/GeertVc
>
> All suggestions/improvements/remarks are welcome.
>
> I would especially ask John Crispin to have a look at the driver (John
> knows what I'm talking about...)
>
> Best rgds,
>
> --Geert
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to