<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.19">
<TITLE>RE: Apache Web Server</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I will try to get some examples of what I am doing out late this week
or early next week. I am swamped at the moment. I also need to check on
what I can post and give away.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks to all those that responded to the original message. Here
is the solution we are looking at.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>We are one of the customers that do not want the Remote +
communication going over the Foxboro Peer to Peer segment as would happen if we used
the standard install of Remote +. We will be assigning a second IP to the Plant
LAN network card. ( Using the hmeX:1 method) and binding the web server that I will
use to that IP.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks again,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Joe</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Heath, Graham [<A
HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:47 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List'</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: Apache Web Server</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hello Joe</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I am not sure of whether you want to pass the information in the
foxboro</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>domain (I could have been underhand of course) but anyway I would be
very</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>interested in the method you are using to grab the real time (ish)
data and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>place it on some web pages. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Graham Heath</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>UK Service department. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Joe Sanguinetti [<A
HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: 04 April 2001 18:34</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: FW: Apache Web Server</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>For those of you that are using or are planning to use the Apache web
server</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>on a Foxboro I/A workstation to provide information to your users, I
have</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>some information that I think the user group needs to address with
the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Foxboro Company. Foxboro is apparently installing a
"Customized" version</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>of apache to allow remote access to the system as part of remote plus
(the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>successor to foxwatch). Instead of a dial up modem a router is
being used.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I think this is great and welcome any help and support that Foxboro
can</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>offer. Here is my concern/issue with how they are doing
this. Foxboro is</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>using port 80 (the default port for web servers) as the listing port
for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>their customized apache web server. This means that if I want
to install</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>apache I would have to configure it to listen on a different port
(port 8080</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>for example). This would then force my users to type in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2><A HREF="http://servername:8080";
TARGET="_blank">http://servername:8080</A> <<A HREF="http://servername:8080";
TARGET="_blank">http://servername:8080</A>> . I asked if Foxboro could</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>use a different port and was told NO. It seems to me that for
the amount of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>time that Foxboro is going to utilize the web server compared to the
amount</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>of use that the web server I installed would get, that they should
use a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>different port on their "Customized" version of
Apache. The other push back</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>was for me to install apache on a different workstation on the
node. That</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>would be fine, but I have several 1 Box nodes that this would not
work on. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2> I am currently using cgi
scripts with foxapi to provide real-time</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>snapshots of the system to operators, electricians, engineers and
managers.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>By using this method I no longer have to push a remote Foxview
session to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>individuals that only want a read only look at what the system is
doing. I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>would be happy to share how I am doing this if anyone is interested.
</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Can the user group PLEASE comment on this. I would hope that
Foxboro will</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>respond if the user group pushes back on this. Please do not
hesitate to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>reply back to me if you need more detail or do not understand what I
am</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>talking about</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT
SIZE=2>-----------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company.
All </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no
warranty </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold
the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur
due to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>your application of information received from this mailing
list.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>To be removed from this list, send mail to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>[EMAIL PROTECTED] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any
mail to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML></x-html>
