On Wed May  3 10:07:33 2000 Kevin FitzGerrell wrote...
>
>Stan,
>We are using 6 AB Stations rather than Integrator 30s at my plant.  I don't
>have a basis for comparison, but I can certainly tell you a little about our
>AB Stations.
>
>The main reason to go with these for us was to keep setup fairly simple --
>setup and continuing work on the stations is exactly like the same work on
>CP30s.  Response time is (can be anyway) faster as a result of only having
>one network for a piece of information to negotiate (we are using DH+ with
>our PLC5s, probably would have needed to go to ControlNet if we had used
>Integrators).

        Why do you say that? Number of connectors on the AB PLC's?
>
>Disadvantages are fairly serious with the AB Stations.  You can't have a
>redundant processor in your PLC when you have an AB Station in place.  You
>must adhere to the Foxboro's maximum data table size limitations when
>setting up the PLC5s -- if any data table exceeds Foxboro's size limits it
>will not read any of that table.  You do not have the option of having
>blocks being change driven -- every block evaluates every scheduled cycle.
>This can result in limiting the number of blocks you can use on an AB
>Station, or can result in needing to run the blocks at slower periods with
>phasing implemented.

        So you are saying on data table file in the PLC (at all not just
        communication files) can be larger than this maximim. What is the
        maximum? PLC5/s have an inherent maximum file size per DT file of 1000
        PLC words anywy.

        Are you saying that all points in teh Inegrator 30 must run at the same
        BPC? I can't have some at say 0.5 sec, and others at say 2 sec.?


-- 
Stan Brown     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
-- 
Windows 98: n.
        useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
        a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
        originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit 
        company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to