> > Thats a possibility, but then you do not win anything by running it in a > > thread. It could as well be run when a memory allocation is done, and then > > as a subroutine. > > No, because the background thread get more time slices during idle moments > and > none at all during intense computations. > GC have to release the control as fast as possible and be able to resume the > job where it left it.
It can also compact generations that are not in the current working set. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
