On 14 mrt 2005, at 10:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
2. I see no difference whatsoever between typ_fun and iso_fun, except
the use of an extra type, which, in my opinion, does not change
anything to the usage or code of these functions. If one is allowed,
the other should be allowed as well.
No, and at present there is no difference in generated code.
Which means that the above example IS a problem.
Only because the compiler currently does not support ISO-style procvars. Olle changed it to accept the syntax (so it works in cases you do not access variables of a parent), but it generates code as if it's a regular procvar (which is indeed wrong). The latter is what Adriaan wants to fix.
Jonas
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
