I think the idea is that exception handling should be kept separate in case a
user wants to use his own exception handling. If the user explicitly wants
to use exception handling, he just includes the sysutils unit.
However, I suppose if the sysutils unit involves some extra code bloat (due to
initialization and finalization), and the user doesn't want to use sysutils in
his project at all (but he does want exception handling) then there should be
an option to use exception handling without the sysutils unit?
(maybe a {$MODE HandleException} ?)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list" <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: [fpc-devel] Re: Patch: Exception handling without SysUtils
| Hello,
|
| I had problems with my mailbox. Please resent your answer to this topic to
| my mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Also, the previos patch was not complete. Here is complete and tested
| version.
|
| Yury Sidorov, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| _______________________________________________
| fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
| http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
|
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
