> > Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an > > older version? > Please give me more datails (history) about "tempbuffer".
Well, it was an empty procedure. But no-one had a clue where it was used for. Probably it had something to do with some very old fpc-TDataset- descendents. So it got removed. But if you can find a reason to keep it there... Maybe that ZEOS uses it? > I can look deeply into ZeosLib and find out why it needs tempbuffer. > Patch with constraints and tempbuffer is really not important. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel