Tomas Hajny wrote: > Marco van de Voort wrote: > >>>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1: >>> >>> -Sk load fpcylix unit >>> >>>what is it for? >> >>Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers >>for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal >>system/sysutils >>unit. > > > BTW, looking at the current implementation - shouldn't GetModuleName be > changed to return name part of ParamStr (0) (without path and extension), > and GetModuleFileName the complete ParamStr (0)?
No, the situation is more complex, that's not implemented yet. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
