On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this correct so far?
Ok. So, FPC will follow chrome/Delphi?
Afaik there is no need to. Chrome is as relevant as C++, since it is a
different language, and Delphi implements .NET stuff, and maybe provides a
backwards compat kludge for win32 at best.
For us, native is the core platform, and how they twist themselves to achieve
compat between .NET and win32 (and how much .NET syntax they borrow) is not
our problem.
Exactly.
That is why I prefer a more 'object pascal' syntax, and not
this preprocessor-like stuff.
Later on, the -MDelphi switch can be used to implement
delphi-compatible parsing. If they do it differently
from chrome, then we'll implement -MChrome...
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
