Hi
Following this discussion, I want to throw in my 2 cents as well:
On a real long term (like 5 or 10 years from now), the solution
should be as "clean" as possible with as little awkward parts because
of backward compatibility. This favors of a more separate solution
with a compatibility layer. Sure enough, this means more work to set
it up and maintain it. Therefore, it will take longer to have it
running, but in the end it will prevent the situation, I'd like to
call the A20 gate situation.
Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
