> >> Math.SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,e > >> xPrecision,exUnderflow,exZeroDivide]);
[...] > > stand for it). Anyway using Set8087CW (which is indeed CPU > > dependant) does work under my equipment, SetExceptionMask doesn't. > > SetExceptionMask calls Set8087CW on x86, so if it doesn't work it's > because you either use it wrongly, or because it translates its > parameters wrongly to the input Set8087CW expects. Maybe both :-) I just was calling SetExceptionMask([exZeroDivide]), without qualifying. OK, thanks. I'll check it, and if I find anything odd in parameter translating I will tell. Anyway, don't pay me too much attention, I gotta review it all this weekend, but AFAICR I think I was using the DOS version under Windows XP (not a proper way of doing things ;-(). Sorry for the incoveniences and the loss of time. Anyhow I'll check it up. Thanx, JMR _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
