> On 4/9/06, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What? Do you mean that FPC implementation of generics wouldn't be > > > based on "type erasure" but on beefed-up-precompiler-macros? Please > > > say I got it all wrong :-o > > > > Do you have documents about "type erasure" in native languages where e.g. a > > string is not an object ? > > You have a point. But I don't think supporting generics for native > types is a must-have. The syntatic sugar for having typesafe > containers and algorithms for _objects_ is all I wanted ;-)
First attempt at a string,object map would already fail. No thanks, too limited. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
