On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 05:16:26 -0300, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote: > J. Peter Mugaas escreveu: >> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:24:39 +0200 (CEST), Daniël Mantione wrote: >> >>> Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef Marco van de Voort: >>> >>> >>>>> Over the years several indy bugs have been fixed, and >>>>> nobody knows the >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Several zlib bugs I meant here of course, some quite high- >>>> profile. >>>> >>>> >>> Hmmm.... True, but I think that should not stop people from >>> using it; if people do not use our libraries, bugs won't get >>> fixed in them. >>> >>> >> I think it goes beyond that. ZLib 1.20 introduced some new >> functions (it's hard to determine what version yours is because >> it simply says 1.2). >> >> There are some ZLib 1.20 functions that your paszlib does not >> support that the standard ZLib libraries support. >> >> Sumary from the changelog: >> === >> - New and improved inflate code >> - About 20% faster >> > Does anyone knows how paszlib compare with zlib.dll regarding speed? > I don't but you may be able to get quite a bit of improvement using the inflateBack, inflateBackEnd, and inflateBackInit_ functions. The one I use is based on the "Enhanced zlib package" from Borland's Code Central (entry ID: 23490) which I then modified for Indy usage and modified so that you can use it in FreePascal. I tested it with an example program in Linux and Win32. If anyone wants to test what I have, please feel free to do so and may be the best code win.
It is part of the source-code downloads that I made last night. The URL is http://www.indyproject.org/sockets/fpc/. -- I once had an open mind until people used it as a trashcan. J. Peter Mugaas, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wvnet.edu/~oma00215 _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
