Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> 
>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> doc build fails with make deb in the fixes_2_0 branch.
>>>> RTL Documentation: fpdoc error "/rtl/unix/graph.pp not found".
>>>> It seems it was moved to packages/base/graph/unix/graph.pp
>>> This has been fixed since some time, you pobably don't have the latest 
>>> sources.
>> strange, normally 'svn up' should do the job. i updated yesterday
>> evening. working copy infos pasted below... I cant see the problem
>>
>>> I had to fix this for the 2.0.4 release candidates, so I'm pretty sure it 
>>> works :-)
>> I didnt had this problem with release_2_0_4_rc2. I can confirm that make
>> deb worked.
>>
>> my working copy:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/fpcbuild/fixes_2_0$ svn info
>> Path: .
>> URL: http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/branches/fixes_2_0
>> Repository Root: http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild
>> Repository UUID: b4dd5b90-57f8-0310-8fd5-d8d89816a767
>> Revision: 150
>> Node Kind: directory
>> Schedule: normal
>> Last Changed Author: hajny
>> Last Changed Rev: 150
>> Last Changed Date: 2006-07-21 22:53:52 +0200 (Fri, 21 Jul 2006)
>> Properties Last Updated: 2006-07-21 23:46:25 +0200 (Fri, 21 Jul 2006)
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/fpcbuild/fixes_2_0$ svn propget svn:externals
>> fpcsrc http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_0
>> fpcdocs http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcdocs/branches/fixes_2_0
> 
> This external is wrong; the docs don't use branches 
> (in each case, I don't update them.)

ok, but the link looks not so bad and obviously wrong for an non-pro ;-)

I have changed the svn:externals-property now in my fixes_2_0 fpcbuild wc :
- fpcdocs http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcdocs/branches/fixes_2_0
+ fpcdocs http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcdocs/trunk
...and its works.

So, wouldn't it make sense to change this link in the fpcbuild repository ?

thx
kisda

> AFAIK this is fixed in the 2.0.4 release-candidate branches.
> 
> You should use either those or simply the main branch.
> 
> Michael.
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to