Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> Micha Nelissen wrote:
>> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i have attached a patch for the fpcbuild repository. Created and tested
>>> with branch fixes_2_0.
>>> The patch contains modifications made by the debian maintainer (deb) for
>>> the official debian packages and some fixes by myself (me).
>>>
>>> D      install/debian/control
>>>   -> not needed and outdated -> remove (me)
>> What makes you think so ?
> 
> not needed: control is created from control.in by script fixdeb like all
> *.in files
> outdated: amd64 arch is missing, but is in control.in
> 

Micha ? Am i wrong ? What about the others files ?
Would be nice to have fpc 2.0.4 in debian etch and not fpc 2.0.0.

kisda

>> Micha
>> _______________________________________________
>> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
>> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to