peter green wrote: >> Changing type to something which is not a descendant (and thus >> incompatible) seems useless and always dangerous to me, so should be >> forbidden if possible. > useless yes, dangerous if not carefull yes but its the number one way for > bypassing "protected" ;)
"protected" as in language (type) protection ? Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
