Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
I created the follow fpcUnit tests. For those that don't know
fpcUnit, the AssertEquals takes three parameters: Failing message,
Expected Value, Actual Value.
Now from the tests below, I am formatting all values to 2 decimal
values. I expected all tests to pass, but it doesn't. Test 9 fails
and said it expected 0.00 which is wrong.
Rules for rounding. If a decimal is exactly halfway (5) or more,
rounding goes up. If decimal is < 5, rounding goes down. This rules
is proven by tests 5, 6, 7 and 8. So why is test 9 failing? Is this
a bug?
AssertEquals('Failing on 1', '0.10', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.1));
AssertEquals('Failing on 2', '0.01', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.01));
AssertEquals('Failing on 3', '0.00', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.001));
AssertEquals('Failing on 4', '0.50', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.5));
AssertEquals('Failing on 5', '0.01', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.0051));
AssertEquals('Failing on 6', '0.05', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.049));
AssertEquals('Failing on 7', '0.00', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.0049));
AssertEquals('Failing on 8', '0.05', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.045));
AssertEquals('Failing on 9', '0.01', FormatFloat('0.00', 0.005));
It is not a bug, it is using bankers rounding. See
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/system/round.html
Vincent
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel