Chris Cheney wrote: >> I'm pretty sure he means that no can no longer, for example, copy a function >> from one class to another, without risking having to rewrite all the >> parameter names. > > You have understood me correctly - I would have expressed it a little > differently, but not as succinctly.
Ok, so enforcing different names is good then, that makes code more context insensitive, since identifiers won't suddenly "resolve" to parameters with the same name. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
