On 04 Feb 2007, at 12:01, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
- No unique check by assigning to character.
True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload [] then.
Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default property.
Then you can't take the address anymore of individual characters, as
Thorsten mentioned on irc last night. E.g. this will not have the
desired effect:
move(mystringobj[1],chararray,mystringobj.len)
But in general I dislike allowing to overload everything but the
kitchen sink, otherwise we'll end up with C++ (which does allow you
to overload pretty much every operator/token, meaning that you always
have to read each and every header and carefully look at each type
before you have any idea at all about what a certain expression could
mean).
Jonas_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
