As you might know, there is no Dos distribution of 2.2.0 release yet. There are several reasons for this, but I am started a small branch that tries to get the minimal changes to get a usable Dos release.
This branch is on the svn repository under fixes_2_2_0_dos. Using the 2.2.0 release sources to create a Dos distribution results in a program that does not work at all under raw Dos, mainly because of the fact that you need to look for '*.*' to get all files under Dos and '*' only lists files without extensions. The other more subtle problem seems to be related to problems in the IDE while debugging when compiling with optimizations set to -O2. Another problem was that the install.dat file, used by the installer, was out of sync with the current sources at release date. As this file is only used for go32v2 and os2 and nobody really tried to generate them, it got unnoticed. I uploaded to ftp.freepascal.org under ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.2.0a/go32v2 separate zip files, with install.exe and install.dat files. The directory shortsep is for people adventurous enough to try to test the installation of the beta dist onto a system without LFN support. The separate directory is for people who would like to test the beta dist on Windows 95/98/Me/2000/XP/Vista or on any Dos distribution having LFN or with a TSR that adds LFN support on your favorite Dos system. I would like to get feedback on the stability of the IDE (especially while debugging executables). If people are willing to help, it would be great to have persons that would try to do a complete rebuilding of the beta dist of their Dos system. Beware that you will need quite a lot of free disk space for that... I am not really sure that using the sources included in the same directory will work for that purpose, but attempts and failures should be reported on that list. The first step would be to install the sources, and try to recompile everything by doing a 'make all OPT="-gl -O- -dDEBUG" UPXPROG=echo' at source level. You should basically regenerate the same executable (alltough the will not match completely as the date is written somewhere inside the debugging information, together with absolute pathes to the sources...) If someone is really willing to try to inspect deeper, doing a second build, removing the -O- option and check if the IDE generated that way behave as smoothly as when I tested the IDE compiled with -O-. By the way, the IDE being compiled with -dDEBUG, should have the ability to switch back and forth between graphic and text mode and thus support debugging for graphic Dos application, provided that you are only using modes defined in the Graph unit. For all answers, please state in the subject that you are usng the beta 2.2.0a for Dos, I am not reading all threads of this mailing list. Pierre Muller _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel