On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:04:06 +0300 Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have ask to all at once. > ========================== > > * Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 > > You don't need to add every unit to a project or package. It is > > sufficient to add the the directories to the unit search path. > > But for update checks, and quick searches it is recommended to > > assign every unit to a specific project or package > > AG: i.e. with project->add unit ? Yes. Or Project Inspector / Add / Add files. > ---------------- > > > If a directory is not in the unit search path, then it will not get > the > > project settings. > > AG: From which (search) paths, have a few tunables ? Sorry, my english is not good enough. What do you mean? > ---------------- > > > Because the IDE does not apply the project settings to everything > (like > > Delphi), the developer finds dangling units quickly and the units > > can use only those units, that they should use. This reduces version > > conflicts, accidental auto rebuilds and context switches. > > AG: That is all fine, but the full control ability (of search > process) interested to me ! What do you mean with interested in full control ability? Do you want to know all places/flags that control the final unit search path? Or do you want one more possibility to control/setup the unit search path? > ---------------- > > >AG> ... > >AG> knowledge... In present IDE behave itself as old bore, or as > >AG> accountant, it's more clever in expectations. > Mattias> Can you give an example? > > AG: What example?, that IDE behaviour remember to me an old bore ? :) An example how to improve it. > ---------------- > > Vincent Snijders>Yiu can compile the IDE with fpc 2.2.0 and develop > applications with fpc > > 2.3.1. > > AG: You right, for my production-critical tasks i will have deed just > so. > > ===================== > and last > > A have construct a quite simple sample, that demonstrates > FPC231<=>Lazarus lacks. > It is only simplified exposition of #10176 issue. I will bring new > issue, as soon as > manits will available. As was supposed by me, the presence of my own > form ancestor > is essential to "unit-read-error" revealing (the IDE-old-bor'ity :) ) The IDE now skips silently missing units when searching for ancestor forms. > A think, that discuss subject "Must IDE editor be such intelligent > (in syntax comprehension sense) as compiler, or syntax highlighting > is enough ?" > would be useful. > What thoughts developers respected about this ? Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel