On Monday 10 December 2007 12:54, Michael Schnell wrote: > IMHO the "parallel" idea is hard to implement, as the compiler needs > to heavily support it.
Nonetheless, this was what this wiki page was about: Proposals for parallel *language* constructs (especially WRT to the C-centric OMP spec). BTW, I didn't have time to look at your proposal, but once I got "procedure of thread" you're quoting here, I'd expect the language to take care of (most) synchronization issues, much like the "protected object" in the Ada language does. Vinzent. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
