Hi Marco,
I have found it :-)
This is one of the draft, but that part has hardly changed:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2461.pdf
Page 244
Item 3 describes the lifespan of a temporary object in expression (rvalue
life span):
3 When an implementation introduces a temporary object of a class that has a
non-trivial constructor (12.1, 12.8), it shall
ensure that a constructor is called for the temporary object. Similarly, the
destructor shall be called for a temporary
with a non-trivial destructor (12.4). Temporary objects are destroyed as the
last step in evaluating the full-expression
(1.9) that (lexically) contains the point where they were created. This is
true even if that evaluation ends in throwing
an exception. The value computations and side effects of destroying a
temporary object are associated only with the
full-expression, not with any specific subexpression.
With best regards,
Boian Mitov
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitov Software
http://www.mitov.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco van de Voort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list" <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Need patch for bugs : 0011503 / 0009472
I will see to ping somebody on the ANSI comity for this one. It takes
forever to dig it out ;-) . I will let you know.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
