In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > It does, thank you. > > However, it's not so spectacular: > Attributes are simply old .NET stuff they ported to Win32. > Seems they had to use a workaround through an attribute class. > > I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than enough > for 99.99% of the cases.
Give the customer what he wants. And a customer doesn't know enough to show any restraint. More is always better, and if sb else has it, I also want it. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
