Jonas Maebe schrieb: > > On 16 Sep 2009, at 20:09, Sven Barth wrote: > >> Jonas Maebe schrieb: >>> As far as I know, there is not a single test for this functionality, >>> so I'm not sure that it actually works. >> >> Well... then I think it's time to change this. >> >> I'll try to test this functionality (and to fix it, if it fails), > > Thanks! > >> but you (or another core developer) should at least tell me how that >> feature is supposed to work and (equally important) be used. > > Frankly, I don't really know. I only discovered this by chance while > working on the Objective-C support. As far as I could tell, you simply > have to use "cppclass" rather than "class", and that's it (the cppdecl > name mangling style is automatically applied to all methods afterwards, > if I remember correctly). I don't think that field accesses can work at > all though, nor calling virtual methods (let alone defining multiple > inheritance hierarchies). The only thing that really seemed to be > implemented was C++ name mangling.
The code is already very old. It worked for very simply classes and gcc 2.95 iirc. But nobody continued so far to improve it. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
