Alexander Klenin пишет:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 23:15, Michael Van Canneyt
<mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
This is all just nitpicking. Iterators as a language construct are a very ugly
hack to save some typing, no matter how you turn it. Nice maybe for
languages with dynamic typing and so on, but really not on it's place in Pascal.
I beg to disagree.This is completely backwards -- like saying that
"while" loop is an
ugly hack to save some typing of "goto" operators.
Iterators and foreach loops are very important tools of structured coding.
The fact that "for..in" may be expressed in terms of lower-level primitives
does not decrease its importance, just like existence of "goto" does
not decrease
the importance of "while".
One can always say vice versa, that 'goto' is an ugly hack and 'while'
is the solution.
In general, the more I read the discussion, the more I agree with Michael.
We should actually discuss:
1) What is the problem we need to solve
2) What existing solutions already exist and can be used
3) What are the advantages and downsides of each existing solution
4) And after that, we could come up to a design of the new feature.
Instead, the discussion is almost ultimately about how to modify the
language.
The strategic view of the situation is also very desirable. For example,
things can change considerably once we have generics are completed, and
maybe there's simply no need trying to fit the iterators into today's state.
Regards,
Sergei
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
