On 25/10/2009, Alexander Klenin <kle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > IMHO, Reset/JumpToBack should not be used inside "for..in" loop -- they are > analogous to "goto" inside for loop. > If "for .. in .. index" extension is implemented, it may be used to call
As I explained in my previous reply to Paul - I did not expect for-in to support everything I use with Iterators. I simply wanted to find out if the for-in implementation is going to clash with my idea of implementing GetIterator() in RTL's container classes. So far I don't see any problems, and I can't see why we can't implement both. There are use-cases for both. I see for-in as a "lite" version of Iterator, but I still have a need for a more "full" implementation as well - supporting a larger method interface. > It does not. I dislike the "Enumerator" term too, but this is how it > is called in Delphi :-( Java uses both, that is why I asked. But yes, I kind-of expected them to be the same thing, but just wanted to make sure. -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
