Vincent Snijders пишет:
I don't like the looks of lines like:
{$IFDEF S}function{$ELSE}var{$ENDIF}foobar_dosomething{$IFDEF D}:
function{$ENDIF}(a:cint; b:cdouble): cint; extdecl;{$IFDEF S}external
foobarlib;{$ENDIF}
They are hard to read. I understand that this way makes sure that both
static and dynamical declaration are in sync, but the loss of
readability is too much.
Maybe it is better to generate a foobar_dyn.inc based on the foobar.inc
or generate both foobar.inc and foobar_dyn.inc from a common file format
(maybe even the original header file).
I second that. If this is intended to be maintained manually, then it is not
maintainable.
If the intention is to handle the updates using automated tools, then it should not matter how much
files to generate.
Sergei
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
