On Friday 13 November 2009 10:16:46 Michael Schnell wrote:
>
> Why should the (future) lcl use "ANSIString". I suppose using ANSIString
> for UTF-8 data was just a nasty hack to do Unicode with the _current_
> FPC. (In contrast the MSE-GUI hack was using Widestring, which is less
> ambiguous and seems to work better on Windows, but needs more
> conversions on Linux.)
>
On Linux xlib and xft have utf-16 interfaces.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to