In our previous episode, dmitry boyarintsev said: > > possible syntax. > > > > It is just a risk without real benefit attached to it, so I'm against. > > +1 > why should pascal care about C legacy?
Depends. I do see a minor point for e.g. ++ and --, since I have been bitten by that when translating e.g. compression code (paszlib, lz77) when these are used in complex nested loops. But this is IMHO not a real risk with the ; thing. (and it is way to intrusive) _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
