On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl> wrote: > In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said: >> > sure that that all filenames are unique. This because there are still two >> > uses clauses will cause problems. >> >> You're right :( >> And if we can do that: >> uses >> zip IN '/units/my/zip.pas' AS myzip; >> zip IN '/units/lib/zip/zip.pas' AS ziplib; >> >> Now, I can point the real path and I can use 'n' units with the same name. >> What do you think about it? > > Still the same problem. If you forget one, or do one wrongly, it will become > a mess. Better avoid the mess altogether, and keep unique names. > > Moreover, everybody still has to edit everything to > substitute their own paths.
Not still, you know... ;-) But I agree it will (maybe) become a mess. However this would be an option (not default) for this some cases. Considering that "in" syntax is still existing... ;-) Well, just my 2 cents... MD. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel