Am 25.07.2010 12:05, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich: > It looks to me as if a ppu reader can provide the information for > previously compiled modules, so that a scanner/parser is not always > required to load a used module?
Probably no. > > Parser > now is derived from the tscannerfile class. This is a really ugly design OOP wise ... > > Most parser units have been split into .pas and .inc files. The .pas > files mostly contain declarations, that can not be moved into the parser > unit without causing circular unit references. Why don't you use separate parser classes for different purposes? Declarations, Function bodies, expressions etc.? > > > All the current_xyz variables must become class elements. Who knows > about the scope and lifetime of these "current" objects, and can give > hints where to move these references? Probably nobody, it is a trial and error process. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
